![]() |
Boost : |
From: Jeff Garland (azswdude_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-22 12:23:42
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Daniel Pfeifer <daniel_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> > Go for it, if you already have your own vision of how it should
> > look. If you spend a lot of time listening to other people and
> > attempting to make a compromise, you'll run out of time before
> > you've even started.
>
> Thanks for your encouragement! I am ready to start. All I need is
> to be accepted for GSoC. If I'm not accepted, I will code it anyway,
> just for fun. But I really could use the money. ;-)
Don't forget to submit your application starting on the 24th.
> As it happens, I've never needed asynchronous database functions;
> > generally I block waiting for the results and if there's other work
> > to do at the same time it's in another thread. Do you have an
> > application using asio that's driving this?
>
> No, I just thought that it might be useful. What do others think
> about asynchronous database access?
>
I think it's useful -- I'd prefer not to resort to managing my own threads
to do this.
Jeff
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk