From: Kevin Scarr (kscarr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-22 14:18:05
Marco Costalba wrote:
> It comes much more naturally to me to think at this:
> if (ptr)
Ok. This usage is fine with me. I guess I just hadn't seen the
overload<> as being a declaration of an object with pointer behaviour.
If that is what it is, then I would prefer the usage above.
Thanks for the clarification,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk