Re: [boost] Review Request: Generalization of the Pimpl idiom

From: Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden]
Date: 2008-04-06 15:35:05

...
> By the way, do you plan to parameterize the number of arguments allowed,
> using maybe preprocessor metaprogramming? Yes I know that this is quite 
ugly,
> but do not limit the user of the library.

Can you show me it could be done. I've started playing with boost::mpl but 
still do not see I could apply it for variable arguments.

...
> Let me know if I can help you with the shared memory
> issues.

That'd be great. I'd integrate and reflect that in the header. If you go 
ahead with that, please wrap that in 

#if 1.35 < BOOST_VERSION
#endif

so that it still works with older versions of Boost that I have to use.

Thanks,
Vladimir.