Re: [boost] [move semantics] Do we have any plan for move semantics emulation?

From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-11 16:06:15

Daniel James wrote:
> On 11/04/2008, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>  I'd like to reiterate the Ion question, "Do we have any plan for move
>>  semantics emulation ?"
> 
> I've started work on boostifying the Adobe move library for use with
> Boost.Unordered (which was suggested during the review) and maybe
> other libraries, although I want to adapt it so it'll work with older
> compilers, C++-0x move semantics and other move implementations (there
> are several in use, and the Adobe library doesn't support non-copyable
> objects - which is important for libraries such as Boost.Thread). I've
> been working in the subversion sandbox
> (http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/branches/sandbox/move), but there's
> still more to do.

Great!

I thought several times about boostifying move emulation, but other 
issues took my time and I didn't even start to write a single line of 
code. Glad to hear you are working on this.

Thanks,

Ion

> 
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>