Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: John Femiani (JOHN.FEMIANI_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-22 16:42:41

Next message: Joachim Faulhaber: "[boost] [date_time] boost time lacking tic-tac"
Previous message: Juergen Hunold: "[boost] [math] svn:boost r45645 - in trunk/libs/math: build test"
In reply to: Marcus Lindblom: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] "leaf""
Next in thread: Marcus Lindblom: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] "leaf""

> >
> > Oops, your right. 'back' would be a lot better, given the c++
> > precedent (std::list).
>
> Indeed. back() is excellent.
>
> Still, does it justify breaking backwards compatibility?
>

I suggested to deprecate, rather than removing anything, in order to
avoid breaking backwards compatibility.

I just meant to suggest documenting it as deprecated.

-- John

Next message: Joachim Faulhaber: "[boost] [date_time] boost time lacking tic-tac"
Previous message: Juergen Hunold: "[boost] [math] svn:boost r45645 - in trunk/libs/math: build test"
In reply to: Marcus Lindblom: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] "leaf""
Next in thread: Marcus Lindblom: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] "leaf""

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk