Re: [boost] [Phoenix] Formal Review Request [was Re: [range/iterators/algorithms/phoenix/bind...] Coordinated Approach]

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-01 22:18:23

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > Eric Niebler wrote:
> 
> >> TODO: replace all Proto's function objects with this wrapper to
> enforce
> >> consistent behavior. All function objects across Boost that need to
> make
> >> rvalue/lvalue distinctions would need to be examined for consistency
> in
> >> this regard. Joel, I'm looking in Fusion's general direction.
> 
> I hear ya.
> 
> > Yep.  It's a big coordination job.
> 
> >> I've already taken the first and (IMO) most important step here by
> >> porting both Lambda and Phoenix to Proto. My opinion on the
> unification
> >> of Lambda and Phoenix is that it shouldn't happen. There are too
> many
> >> subtle differences in semantics. Rather, Lambda should be retired
> and
> >> Phoenix should be promoted (after being reviewed, etc.).
> >
> > That's OK too, although Joel still seems to be intent on an eventual
> merger.
> 
> No, Eric talked me out of it. I guess, with that in light, I'll ask
> for a Phoenix review then. Ahhh! Another bungee jumping adventure!
> 
> (CC'ing Ronald Garcia)
> 
> Ronald, please consider this a formal review request.

If nobody objects I would like to serve as the review manager.

Regards Hartmut