Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-02 10:55:56

Next message: Arno Schödl: "Re: [boost] [SPAM (Bayesian)] - Re: lifetime of ranges vs. iterators - Bayesian Filter detected spam"
Previous message: JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ: "[boost] [flyweight] making the post-review version of Boost.Flyweight work with Boost 1.36"
In reply to: Arno Schödl: "Re: [boost] [SPAM (Bayesian)] - Re: lifetime of ranges vs. iterators - Bayesian Filter detected spam"
Next in thread: Arno Schödl: "Re: [boost] [SPAM (Bayesian)] - Re: lifetime of ranges vs. iterators - Bayesian Filter detected spam"
Reply: Arno Schödl: "Re: [boost] [SPAM (Bayesian)] - Re: lifetime of ranges vs. iterators - Bayesian Filter detected spam"

AMDG

Arno Schödl wrote:
> This would blow up, I believe. It gets expanded on both begin and end, causing exponential storage growth.
>

Ok. Right. Incidentally, the storage required is not exponential
because it is not
all needed at once, but I see your point.

I like the idea of having the filter_iterator contain a copy of the range.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view