Re: [boost] [simple_segregated_storage] segfault

Subject: Re: [boost] [simple_segregated_storage] segfault
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-02 12:33:55

"Chris Newbold" <Chris.Newbold_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:6F6A2FC198A0F943ACC2259C38A2E30B6B6FB4BDA5_at_EXCHANGE-AH.ad.mathworks.com...

[...]

> The sp_counted_base at 0x82f4b28 at frame #0 is completely bogus. Some 
> further instrumentation of the pool reveals that the address 0x82f4b28 is 
> owned by the pool, but has never been handed out to the application.

I will verify this but what I personaly get is a ordered_malloc() failure on 
the 2005th attempt.  3 blocks of memory get allocated / deallocated over and 
over until the allocation routine fails.

-Phil