Re: [boost] tie alternative?

Subject: Re: [boost] tie alternative?
From: Johan Torp (johan.torp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 02:58:57

David Abrahams-3 wrote:
> 
>   for (vertex_iterator pv,ve = xxx(pv,vertices(g)); pv != ve; ++pv)
>   {
>       ...
>   }
> 
> My only problem is how to spell xxx.  The attached proof-of-concept uses
> operator%, but I don't feel particularly good about that choice either.
> Ideas?
> 

unpack or expand perhaps.

Best Regards, Johan Torp
www.johantorp.com

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/tie-alternative--tp20181162p20182634.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.