Re: [boost] [thread/interprocess] [repost] could we improve recursive_mutex constructor

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread/interprocess] [repost] could we improve recursive_mutex constructor
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-24 06:47:22

Hello, I first posted this six months ago, allow me to repost just in
case it went unnoticed:

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:33 PM
Subject: [boost] [thread/interprocess] could we improve recursive_mutexconstructor

> 
> Hi,
> 
> the recursive_mutex constructor initialize/set/destroy the 
> pthread_mutexattr_t every time.
> I'm wondering if we can improve the efficiency storing this on a static 
> variable which will be initialized once.
> What could be the better way to initialize this static variable?
> 
> Note: the same applies to interprocess mutexes.
> 
> recursive_mutex()
> {
> // begin code that can be initialized only once
>    pthread_mutexattr_t attr;
>    int const init_attr_res=pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr);
>    if(init_attr_res)
>    {
>        throw thread_resource_error();
>    }
>    int const 
> set_attr_res=pthread_mutexattr_settype(&attr,PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE);
>    if(set_attr_res)
>    {
>        throw thread_resource_error();
>    }
> // end code that can be initialized only once
>    int const res=pthread_mutex_init(&m,&attr);
>    if(res)
>    {
>        throw thread_resource_error();
>    }
> // begin code that can be removed
>    BOOST_VERIFY(!pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&attr));
> // end code that can be removed
> }
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Vicente
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>