Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?

Subject: Re: [boost] [mpl] is there a or_seq like logical metafunction?
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-16 14:43:59

On 02/16/09 11:15, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> AMDG
> 
> Larry Evans wrote:
>> The times for all three implementations were all the same:
>>
>>   user: [and_seq_and_iter.o] 0.000016
>>   system: [and_seq_and_iter.o] 0.000003
>>
>> And this is where the vector size was BOOST_MPL_LIMIT_VECTOR_SIZE,
>> which was 20.
> 
> I don't trust the timings produced by bjam.  I know it doesn't work on
> windows, but I haven't looked at the unix implementation.  Can you test
> something that you know takes a significant amount of time to compile?

I don't have anything handy like that.  I know some spirit grammars
take a long time; however, I don't have any big spirit grammars
that might take a long time.

Could the spirit guys provide some code?