Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-02 10:04:11

on Fri Feb 27 2009, Neil Groves <neil-AT-grovescomputing.com> wrote:

> Hello!
>
>>
>> E.g. an algorithm like transform(-) should return a range.

Agreed in that case.  For  transform in-place:

    r = transform(r, f)

>> Or perhaps we need a new syntax to enable
>>
>>  rng && rng2 | transformed(binary_fun())
>
> It seems that the '|' syntax is not much loved despite my deep
> affection for it. 

I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it I love it!

> I am becoming inclined to concentrate more on the
> function syntax and just using the 'ed' convention.

nononono, please!

I have no affection for 'ed,' neither.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com