Subject: Re: [boost] [mpi] Automatically Cascading/Nested Reduce?
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-21 03:43:30
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:46 AM, John Phillips
> Â What MPI implementation are you using?
I'm using OpenMPI version 1.2.6 on Gentoo Linux.
> Â I ask because I believe that at least some of them already use
> optimizations of this sort when implementing reduce.
Oh, that's good to know.
> That is really more the
> right place for a communications scheme of this sort.
You may be right, I haven't looked at it that way. :-)
> Boost.MPI just uses
> the facilities for this that are provided by MPI itself. In principle, the
> MPI implementation should do the reduce in as efficient a way as it can.
> What does yours currently do?
Right. I have noticed that reduce takes more time on the root node
when you use the 'world' communicator than the communication does.
This led me to think that the cost of reducing the data coming from
the other nodes is dominating the whole execution time -- if the
reductions happened in an hierarchical fashion I'm thinking this
should limit the sequential parts of the computation and leverage the
available parallelism in the system.
I haven't looked at whether OpenMPI does what I'm looking for that's
why I was asking if it might be worth implementing at the Boost.MPI
layer. Although it would be nice if OpenMPI did it for me in the first
-- Dean Michael Berris | Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. blog.cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/mikhailberis | linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | profiles.friendster.com/mikhailberis | deanberris.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk