Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Bug Sprint Report - status=feedback
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-03 12:06:47

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Ticket #637 - Adjusts mpl::pair concept to be compatible with STL pairs"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] Bug Sprint Report - status=feedback"

on Sat May 30 2009, "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet-AT-wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Shouldn't we have a ticket status that states feedback for more information from the
> reporter? IMO the feedback ticktes shouldn't be counted as active from the developper
> point of view.

Does this describe the workflow you're thinking of?
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/WorkFlow/Examples#OpenSourceopensource-workflow.ini

https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/TracWorkflow describes the configuration
of this Trac feature. It would be fantastic if you'd like to work out a
proposal for Boost!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Ticket #637 - Adjusts mpl::pair concept to be compatible with STL pairs"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] Bug Sprint Report - status=feedback"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk