Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Change to documentation writing guidelines
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-03 12:10:16


on Mon Jun 01 2009, "Stewart, Robert" <Robert.Stewart-AT-sig.com> wrote:

> Daniel James wrote
> On Monday, June 01, 2009 3:29 PM
>> 2009/5/31 Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>> Oh, I've got an objection myself. That part of the document concerns
>> the C++ standard documentation guidelines, where this isn't
>> appropriate. So instead I added an extra paragraph to the
>> introduction:
>>
>> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/53551/trunk
>> https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/more/writingdoc/structure.html#introduction
>
> The introduction is not a good place to document content requirements. I suggest
> something like the following:

Daniel and Robert, thank you for being on top of this one. I'm sure
we'll end up with something good!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk