Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] [#1861] Change for the default duration format
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-17 15:56:16
Ilya Bobir wrote:
On Wednesday, June 17, 2009 6:40 AM
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > Ilya Bobir wrote:
> >> What is so different about
> >> time_duration td;
> >> cin >> td;
> >> from
> >> int v;
> >> cin >> v;
> >> that makes you discuss an alternative error reporting
> >> strategy for the time duration input facet?
> > Because apparently not everyone is happy with the current strategy.
> If the time period input and/or output facet will do error
> reporting in a non-standard way would not it be confusing?
What is nonstandard about the input facet throwing an exception if the input isn't valid?
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk