Re: [boost] is_base_of<int, int> behaviour.

Subject: Re: [boost] is_base_of<int, int> behaviour.
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-03 18:48:49

John Maddock wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Some time ago we made is_base_of<int,int>::value true, for reasons that 
> escape me, and the TR1 followed this.
> 
> However, C++0X makes is_base_of<non_class, non_class>::value to be 
> false, which seems all round more logical to me.

Not only that but I would have intuitively thought that is_base_of<> 
would always be false if either template parameter is a non-class type.