Subject: Re: [boost] boost.uuid is_pod failure
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-16 06:26:51
> Without some (as yet unspecified) help from the compiler, ispod will
> never report that a class or struct is a POD; this is always safe, if
> possibly sub-optimal. Currently (May 2005) only MWCW 9 and Visual C++ 8
> have the necessary compiler-_intrinsics.
ah, thanks ...
i have attached a small patch providing a class specialization for
is_pod<uuid>. would it be possible to include it?
-- tim_at_[hidden] http://tim.klingt.org Question: Then what is the purpose of this "experimental" music? Answer: No purposes. Sounds. John Cage
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk