Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?
From: Peter Foelsche (peter_foelsche_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-03 17:22:21

Next message: Matthias Troyer: "Re: [boost] [xpressive] Performance Tuning?"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] Bizarre bug"
In reply to: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?"
Next in thread: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?"
Reply: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?"

"Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:24b520d20907231123u1f71b719y7523f1e17aac42e5_at_mail.gmail.com...
> Function needs to work when RTTI is not available. It's acceptable for

why would RTTI not be available?
What exactly forces you to switch off RTTI?
Why does this compiler switch exist?

Next message: Matthias Troyer: "Re: [boost] [xpressive] Performance Tuning?"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] Bizarre bug"
In reply to: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?"
Next in thread: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?"
Reply: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] [function] should it require rtti?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk