Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.Polygon starts today August 24, 2009
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-30 00:09:17


On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Simonson, Lucanus
J<lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> I ran the test with most of the compilers I have available.
>> I'm getting a lot of compiler warnings from msvc-9.0express,
>> msvc-8.0express, and gcc-3.4.4.
>> gcc-4.2.3, gcc-4.3.0, and gcc-mingw-4.4.1 are fine.
>
> I'm aware of the warnings in MSVC.  How important is it to fix these warnings?  What is boost policy and precident?  I am well aware that I will catch no end of grief from users if they get a slew of warnings.  I have no internal MSVC users, but I've spent days chasing warnings for EDG and gcc.

I am an MSVC user, and this library I would actually use (mostly for
handling 3d triangles). I compile with warnings treated as errors, so
yes, any warnings would be "bad bad bad very bad". ;-)

I am rather busy currently, but if I get any time here soon I can try
running tests and such to help with fixing any warnings.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk