Subject: Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 11:27:46
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:08 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> I'm hoping Troy can give us a public report on the modularization
>>>>> effort. Troy?
>>> I suppose a picture is worth a thousand words:
>>> Please stop reading now and look at that. Look for cycles and
>>> dependencies that don't seem to make sense.
>> I actually don't see /very/ much there that doesn't make sense.
> I do. Why does spirit depend on xpressive?
AFAICT it doesn't now. This may be an artifact from when
proto lived under xpressive?
> Why does xpressive depend on intrusive?
Again it doesn't directly. I have no idea why this dependency appears.
> And why *doesn't* proto depend on mpl?
The graph displayed is incomplete. proto depends on fusion which depends on
function_type which depends on mpl.
> These are just the first three things I checked. :-P
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk