Re: [boost] [test] trunk breakage [PATCH]

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] trunk breakage [PATCH]
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-05 23:04:03

On 1/6/2010 2:38 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Any reason to prefer this implementation to the one currently in trunk?

You mean, aside from the fact that it is standard C++03, conforms to 
Boost's coding guidelines, requires no compiler-specific workarounds, 
and is unlikely to be broken on platforms that are not being actively 
tested; whereas the one currently on trunk is none of those things? Not 
really, no. :-P

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com