Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5

Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
From: Bjørn Roald (bjorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-01 00:49:35

On Sunday 31 January 2010 11:20:29 pm Patrick Horgan wrote:
> I've put some new/improved/resized icons up to reflect the discussion.
> 
> http://dbp-consulting.com/boostvariantslogo.html

These are all good as far as layout.  I think the two-liners work fairy well.

I dislike the "under construction" variant.  If we keep it it should be 
changed to "under construction for" two-liner, but I think "preliminary 
proposal for" cover tat use case better.

my vote is:

preliminary proposal for 
proposal for
using

With the option of cutting the first and adding a requirement to add proposal 
state information in a mandatory text legend at start of documentation.

-- 
Bjørn