Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 06:06:19

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)"
Previous message: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?"

Beman Dawes wrote:

> It was designed that way on the assumption that file_status would
> eventually include additional state information.
>
> But that never happened, so it looks like over-design my part.

What other information were you thinking of? Permissions? Lock state?

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)"
Previous message: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk