Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-25 23:15:44
On 02/26/2010 02:04 AM, Daniel James wrote:
> On 25 February 2010 20:16, Andrey Semashev<andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I think, this would at least delay the official acceptance of Boost.Atomic,
>> as there will be less spur for it to happen.
> Since it looks unlikely that Boost.Atomic is going to put be up for
> review in the foreseeable future,
Is that so? Is it known why?
> delaying another library to
> encourage it would be counter productive.
I think helping the author to bring the library into Boost would do a
better job to the community.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk