Re: [boost] [function] improvements/proposals

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] improvements/proposals
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-27 05:25:48

"Rutger ter Borg" <rutger_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:hm8ilo$q2u$1_at_dough.gmane.org...
> Given a number of articles on the web titled "Fast Delegates for C++" or
> similar, and how they're supposed to be better and faster than
> Boost.Function, I am curious if you were able to make progress on this
> matter?

Yes ;)
...as briefly outlined in the first post of this thread ( 
http://old.nabble.com/-function--improvements-proposals-p27207383.html ) ... 
there you can also find links to previous threads that discussed the issues in 
(much) greater detail...

I have also found various 'fast delegates'-type of articles (if memory serves 
me right I've posted a link to one in one of my first posts on this subject) 
but did not yet seriously go through them as the changes I made were already so 
numerous that it seemed it would be better if we first discuss the changes so 
far before proceeding further...
...unfortunately I am still waiting for a response from Dogulas Gregor (he said 
he is currently swamped with his 'real job')...

-- 
"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual 
devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from 
one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman