Subject: Re: [boost] [Tokenmap] A (perfect) hash container library chcked-in to sandbox (RFC)
From: Daniel Trebbien (dtrebbien_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-02 22:44:46
> Although I disagree with your conclusion that the container as-is doesn't
> guarantee perfect hashing, your posting was very insightful. Please read on
> why I think so.
I don't quite understand. I was hoping to explain that I think your
implementation does guarantee perfect hashing.
Maybe I should not have used the word "problem" (it wasn't a good use
of the word). By "problem" I meant a general problem, like a "math
problem", but not a problem with your code. With full context, the
"problem" was the problem of writing a hash map that implements
> Given the conditions 1 and 2 from your posting are met by the container's
> present implementation, I believe there is no problem.
Agreed. I, too, believe that there is no problem with your implementation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk