Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process
From: Daniel Trebbien (dtrebbien_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-27 18:28:25

Next message: Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights (utility/value_init)"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights"
In reply to: Bruno Santos: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"

> By the way, the POSIX subsystem uses an undocumented NT mechanism (a
> debug port) to properly implement signals.

Do you know of a reference which describes the undocumented "debug
port" mechanism?

Next message: Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights (utility/value_init)"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Transfer of Maintenance Rights"
In reply to: Bruno Santos: "Re: [boost] [GSoC] Some Ideas about the Boost.Process"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk