Subject: Re: [boost] Let's use stack exchange!
From: Eric MALENFANT (Eric.Malenfant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-16 09:26:58
It seems that this message did not make it to the list when I sent it yesterday.
Resending, and sorry for the noise if it ends up being a duplicate.
De : Scott McMurray
> On 15 April 2010 14:20, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > In addition it should help us with review managers issues. We can use
> > "reputation" based system to qualify potential managers.
> You "win" on Stack Overflow by refreshing like mad and putting in the
> barest of answers as quickly as possible to get "first post", then
> editing just enough to make it acceptable so others don't look at it
> since it already has an accepted answer. I doubt that system will
> find the kind of people we want as arbiters of the contents of Boost.
Just wondering: This is possibly more related to the size, variety, or "culture" of the "stackoverflow community" than a consequence of the system itself. Things may be different in an eventual "boostoverflow community".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk