Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [castor] Interest in Logic Paradigm for C++ ?
From: Andrew Sutton (andrew.n.sutton_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-01 17:33:15

Next message: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review"
Previous message: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review"
In reply to: Roshan: "Re: [boost] [castor] Interest in Logic Paradigm for C++ ?"
Next in thread: Roshan: "Re: [boost] [castor] Interest in Logic Paradigm for C++ ?"
Reply: Roshan: "Re: [boost] [castor] Interest in Logic Paradigm for C++ ?"

> Not at all. I was trying to pointing out to Robert that Boost is interested
> in all kinds of libraries.
>

I must have misread the previous post. I did reply before my morning coffee,
so I may not have understood :) My apologies.

I guess the next step is requesting that Castor be added to review queue.

Andrew Sutton
andrew.n.sutton_at_[hidden]

Next message: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review"
Previous message: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review"
In reply to: Roshan: "Re: [boost] [castor] Interest in Logic Paradigm for C++ ?"
Next in thread: Roshan: "Re: [boost] [castor] Interest in Logic Paradigm for C++ ?"
Reply: Roshan: "Re: [boost] [castor] Interest in Logic Paradigm for C++ ?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk