Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Third release is ready, requesting preliminary review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-03 18:28:47

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/03/2010 03:55 PM, vicente.botet wrote:

>> my point is if you want to "understand why" then why don't you look at
>> the sources instead of making guesses? that will answer your
>> question(s) and make the discussion more constructive
> 
> In a post from yesterday it was said that the arithmetic operators 
> were not implemented following move semantics. The signatures were 
> given, but no replay to this post has been done yet. I'm sure that
> the poster was looking into the sources.

Did I miss a message? I've been trying to answer everything that seemed
to need an answer. I don't see any messages that include function
signatures that I didn't respond to...?
- -- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkvfTh8ACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wRm/QCffTdaU6t7/GwTbBFMcH+r9xjI
/IcAoPjXAUF6vLGe2LYsuaU0bXdNDUyn
=rzWu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----