Re: [boost] performance of a linear algebra/matrix library

Subject: Re: [boost] performance of a linear algebra/matrix library
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-06 14:20:35

on 06.05.2010 at 22:12
 vicente.botet wrote :
>> performance is an important thing but i will not go C anyway

>  I was referring to Boost.LA. But if you need configurable sizes for your matrixes

yes i got it
i respect boost la approach but it does not serve my purposes

>> i haven't yet
>> uBLAS docs claim there is no abstraction penalty for relativly large
>> matrices but i don't know with what kind of C code they compared,
>> maybe it is inefficient by the same factor as ublas routines giving
>> apparently no abstraction penalty

> The best thing to do is check it yourself. It should be not too complex.

i'll end up with it eventually

-- 
Pavel