Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Request for comments/interest
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-03 13:20:45


----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Golubiewski" <tjgolubi_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Request for comments/interest

>
> Robert Stewart wrote:
>
> However, a reverse copy is not always correct for changing endianness,
> though certainly so for changes between big and little endianness.
>
> I agree, just as swapping is not always correct either.

+1
Vicente


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk