Subject: Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe
From: Christopher Jefferson (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-20 07:06:32
On 20 Jul 2010, at 11:54, Robert Kawulak wrote:
>> From: Vladimir Prus
>>> Some additional suggestions:
>> Thanks. However, I am not sure the association with 'make' is something we want,
>> and 'boostb' and 'bbv2' are somewhat cryptic. I was thinking about just 'b2',
>> but Rene does not like that much either. And 'bb' is more like sound a child
>> might make ;-)
> IMHO 'bb' is the winning option. An obvious reference to Boost.Build, very quick to type and not as generic as 'build'.
My linux box already has a program called 'bb' installed, defined as 'aa for X'. Perhaps not very common, but already labelled as bb in my package repositories.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk