Re: [boost] [guidelines] why template errors suck

Subject: Re: [boost] [guidelines] why template errors suck
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-03 17:52:20

On 28/09/2010 19:22, David Abrahams wrote:
> At Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:45:23 +0100,
> Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>>
>> On 28/09/10 18:33, David Abrahams wrote:

>> Please demonstrate how you check that a type models a concept without
>> using a set of valid expressions to define the concept, but only with
>> signatures
>
> See the implementation of ConceptGCC.  There's a demonstration in
> working code. But...

Sorry, I assumed we were talking about standard C++, or eventually about 
the soon-to-standard C++0x.

I.e. solutions that we can really use in the real world.