Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-12 14:08:39

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Walker
<daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:44 AM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:19:31 -0400,
>> Daniel Walker wrote:
> swapping out throw_bad_function call does not directly address
> the boost::function/Boost.Exception coupling issue.

It could be implemented such that the dependency on
boost::throw_exception is only there if the default throwing behavior
is used.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode