Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Report # 29 (aka 1.45 blockers) is too narrow
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-25 11:50:26


On 10/25/2010 6:41 AM, Jim Bell wrote:
> So all agree that the 1.45 blockers report needs to be changed, at least
> to remove the milesone.

No, I object. That list represents bugs that the release managers have
deemed important. The bugs that random boost users deem important is
less interesting.

Would it be nice to go through all the bugs and make sure they're
categorized correctly? You bet. Would I hold up 1.45 for it? Nope.

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk