Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for

Subject: Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for
From: Michel MORIN (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-21 01:42:23

Michel MORIN wrote:
>> B.
>> If boost::begin/end doesn't need to be found via ADL,
>> then use ADL barrier technique to boost::begin/end.
>>
> Oooops, I made a mistake!
> Definitely, solution B is not a choice.
> It diables Boost-interfaced range from using in range-based for.

Oops, again. Solution B is not a choice, but the reason is wrong.
B does not solve the problem, because there are still ambiguity
between std::begin/end and boost::fusion::begin/end.

Sorry for the noise.

Regards,
Michel