Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for

Subject: Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for
From: Michel MORIN (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-30 13:54:31

> ADL for Fusion may be convenient in some cases,

Such as I/O and comparisons?

BTW, I'm curious to know which is better in this case:
  - Define Fusion sequences in an ADL-barrier namespace. For the functions
    that need to be found via ADL, also define them in that namespace.
or
  - Define Fusion's begin/end (and other functions that should NOT be found
    via ADL) in an ADL barrier namespace.

Regards,
Michel