Subject: Re: [boost] Improving review process
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-13 12:26:22
> - A library can only be added in the review schedule if the author has time in
> near future to have a review, where near future is, say, 3 months.
well, it would be great if the review would actually happen within a time frame
of 3 months. unfortunately, it is a bit different in reality: the boost.lockfree
library is on the review queue for more than a year. with 6 reviews per year
(like in 2010) and 15 libraries earlier in the queue, i don't expect a review to
happen before 2013. in a way, this is kind of nice since the dependency to
boost.atomic (c++0x-atomics for c++-98) will hopefully be obsolete since
compilers may already be reasonably c++0x-compliant.
so a time frame of 3 months is probably more a time frame of 3 years :/
-- tim_at_[hidden] http://tim.klingt.org Music is the can opener of the soul. It makes you terribly quiet inside, makes you aware that there's a roof to your being. Henry Miller
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk