Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-28 08:59:33
Matus Chochlik wrote:
> I have had the exactly the same feeling (about the apples and
> orangutans) the whole time I've participated in the immutable
> vs. unicode string discussion. I know that Dean tries to focus
> on performance and does not care about encodings and I do care
> about performance just not so much Dean, does.
That's unfair and wrong. Dean's view<utf8_encoding> type was roughly equivalent to your utf8_string (names aside) all along. He espouses a different approach to managing data storage and the encoding than do you, but that doesn't mean he "does not care about encodings."
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk