Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)

Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-06 16:02:03

At Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:32:06 -0500,
Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
> 
> Agreed. I think we discussed the syntax stuff enough.

Well, just one thing I'd like to add: it would be a shame if your Boost library
doesn't provide alternate macros usable by anyone who is willing to depend on
the C99 preprocessor, that take advantage of variadics.

    BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_(...) 

anyone?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com