Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review
From: Chad Nelson (chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-07 00:12:40

On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:25:00 +0200
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> [...] For the people who do care, the library should provide free
> function templates that operate on a well-defined Integer concept
> which is "operationless" on its own and only stores bits (in chunks
> of some element_type perhaps). The supplied 'integer' class would be
> our best effort of implementing this concept in the manner we think
> is best for the users who want us to make this decision for them. The
> rest should be able to define their own integer classes and get the
> operations "for free".

That's what I'm aiming for in the long run, as a result of the feedback
I've gotten during the review.
-- 
Chad Nelson
Oak Circle Software, Inc.
*
*
*