Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review
From: SATAN66613 (SATAN66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-07 14:27:20
on 07.03.2011 at 13:48
Christopher Jefferson wrote :
> So users of a expression-template based xint would need to know about proto::deep_copy?
> Also, I would expect these problems to become more serious in C++0x
> code, because users will probably write expressions like:
> auto i = x + y;
> Which would be fine for built-in types, and introduce bugs if x or
> y was an xint::integer, using proto.
could we prevent this misusage by making copy constructor of the
expression class private (possibly never implementing it)?
-- Pavel P.S. if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message please point it out
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk