Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review
From: SATAN66613 (SATAN66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-07 14:27:20

on 07.03.2011 at 13:48
 Christopher Jefferson wrote :
> So users of a expression-template based xint would need to know about proto::deep_copy?

> Also, I would expect these problems to become more serious in C++0x
> code, because users will probably write expressions like:

> auto i = x + y;

> Which would be fine for built-in types, and introduce bugs if x or
> y was an xint::integer, using proto.

could we prevent this misusage by making copy constructor of the
expression class private (possibly never implementing it)?

-- 
Pavel
P.S.
if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message
please point it out