Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [context review] Updated vote
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-28 10:14:26


Hello Giovanni,

thank you for your review (and of course all others) - it really helps
to get the lib shaped (I got very view responses before the review).

I've started to modify the lib (you can take a look at
git://gitorious.org/boost-dev/boost-dev.git, branch context-dev) in
order to address the issues raised by the review.
If I believe all issues are addressed we can start a mini-review (or
I'll send you and the other reviews an eMail for checking the new
variant for discussion).

best regards,
Oliver

Am 28.03.2011 15:46, schrieb Giovanni Piero Deretta:
> Hi all,
>
> There is a lack of reviews so far and the review deadline is getting
> close; as I really, really would like to see a context switching
> library into boost in one way or another, I would like to change my
> vote from a negative to conditional acceptance. These are the
> conditions:
>
> - A C (or low level), light weight API is publicly exposed and documented
> - Context is made movable, without additional memory allocation for
> non legacy (i.e. ucontext) implementations.
> - The documentation is polished and expanded with a discussion on
> context switching and use cases.
>
> I do not think these points are particularly contentious as Oliver has
> already stated that at least the first two is in his TODO list and
> that he will make context movable.
>
> Of course I would like Oliver to address the other points raised by me
> and others reviewers.
>
> I also encourage Oliver to engage more in discussions with the
> reviewers; the mail threads just died off after a few replies and not
> all issues raised were discussed.
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk