Subject: Re: [boost] [lexical-cast] version of lexical_cast in 1.46.1 is quite older than in trunk
From: Vicente BOTET (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-07 02:00:32
> Message du 07/04/11 00:49
> De : "Vladimir Batov"
> A : boost_at_[hidden]
> Copie Ã :
> Objet : Re: [boost] [lexical-cast] version of lexical_cast in 1.46.1 is quite older than in trunk
> > Antony Polukhin gmail.com> writes:
> > ...
> > Added some optimizations for casts to integral types ( you can see
> > them in tickets #5417 and #5350).
> > Did not used strtol/strtod (it will be hard to implement tags/ios
> > flags if we`ll use them, hard to detect overflows), did not used
> > spirit library (it`s too big, includes too many files, and looks like
> > it`s API changes often).
> Various limitations of and extension requests to the existing lexical_cast
> persistently (and understandably) keep popping up on this list. Quite some time
> back now I myself was requesting a few features added to it and thought it'd be
> relatively straightforward. Back then I was explained by Kevlin Henney (the
> lexical_cast author) and Alexander Nasonov (the current maintainer) that the
> requested features were spilling over the original lexical_cast design concept
> and, essentially, lexical_cast was closed for extension business (or so I
> understood). That resulted in lengthy discussions (search for [convert] in
> archives) where to go and how to proceed and in the end the decision has been
> made to essentially branch off or to break free or to start fresh (whatever
> one's preference might be) and now there has been the Convert proposal sitting
> in the queue and getting ready for the review this month. I'd suggest anyone
> interested in additional lexical_cast features to have a look the the proposal
> if it already satisfies your needs. If not, then it's most definitely open for
It will be great to have a performance comparison between your library and lexical cast (with a without the proposed modifications) as one of the major concerns of your library were to provide an interface that performs better than lexical_cast.
Maybe Antony can provide the program he used to make the comparison before and after the patch
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk