Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Pool] TR1?
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-11 23:40:38
On 4/11/2011 6:02 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Whatever the costs, you have a point because this is something that
> can only be implemented portably by the standard. I'm certain that
> Boost.Pool invokes undefined behavior whenever it returns false from
Indeed 'false' basically means your not sure if the pointer will
eventually be part of the pool or not but 'true' is authoritative in its
quest to locate a current object.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk