Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.Pool] TR1?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-13 10:50:28
On 13 April 2011 03:34, Anders Dalvander <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Or if std::less would be used instead of operator<.
While the undefined behavior goes away, all that std::less guarantees is a
total ordering for pointers. It doesn't specify what that ordering actually
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk