Subject: Re: [boost] [provocative] Whom did the SFC pay to list boost developers as a whole in "Current Member Projects"?
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-30 15:03:57
> Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> > we as Boost developers ...
> Please name "we", Kaiser.
FWIW, my first name is Hartmut and usually it's taken as an offense in
Germany to refer to somebody by using his last name only.
> To repeat:
> Whom did the SFC pay to list boost developers as a whole in "Current
> Member Projects"?
I don't care who paid SFC (although I doubt somebody did). I'm asking why
Boost shouldn't be represented by SFC in the first place. Your initial mail
uses Legaleeze to detail apparent facts; I'd prefer you used English
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk