Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Formal Review Result
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-03 19:30:44

Next message: Edward Diener: "[boost] [Review] Boost.Convert review decision"
Previous message: Matthew Chambers: "Re: [boost] Porting boost::lexical_cast tests to boost::convert"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [xint] Formal Review Result"
Next in thread: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [xint] Formal Review Result"

On 30 April 2011 17:15, Vladimir Prus <vladimir_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> - It was pointed out that "a + b + c" creates a pile of temporaries, and this
>> can be improved without using ET.
>
> As noticed by Lars Viklund on IRC, "without" is a typo and should have been "with".

I haven't looked the library, but it could possibly be improved
without ET by using move semantics.

Next message: Edward Diener: "[boost] [Review] Boost.Convert review decision"
Previous message: Matthew Chambers: "Re: [boost] Porting boost::lexical_cast tests to boost::convert"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [xint] Formal Review Result"
Next in thread: Chad Nelson: "Re: [boost] [xint] Formal Review Result"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk